Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(26)
This method has been criticized because it assumes that species ranges are stable, which they are not.
This method has been criticized by many researchers later.
The method has been criticized to have several shortcomings.
However, the crisp RPN method has been criticized to have several deficiencies.
Bacon's method has been criticized as impractical and too inflexible for any living, practicing scientist.
This method has been criticized for increasing toxicity of seabed, killing of fish eggs and other aquatic organisms.
Similar(33)
Moreover, Pohar-Perme's method had been criticized by Dickman et al. [ 6], who showed that Pohar-Perme's estimator may lead to "increased variability and lack of stability for long-term survival, particularly for older age groups".
The identification of validity and verification as the testing methods has been criticized.
Finally, the case study approach, like many qualitative methods, has been criticized for being unable to produce generalisations.
These methods have been criticized though.
The city's methods have been criticized as overly rigid and ineffective.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com