Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
It is shown that this method gives results comparing favorably with results from the literature.
The proposed analytical method gives results close to the experimental results and can be used to calculate ultimate collapse load for such type of infilled system.
Verification tests are performed to demonstrate that this general computational method gives results in agreement with known classical problems where uniform edge loading is employed.
It is shown that while the averaging method fails to predict the behaviour of the system the Ritz method gives results surprisingly close to those obtained by the simulation method.
For further reading on PCA we recommend a publicly available tutorial.[20] To investigate whether our method gives results that depend on the presence of specific arrays, we randomly divided the human dataset into two equally sized sets and then generated new TSRs using PCA, each based on only half of the data.
The obtained NC values are very close to 1. Compared to the previous works, our proposed method gives results near to those found in the literature.
Similar(53)
For the density, the stereological method gave results that were 11.7 ± 12.1% larger than X-ray tomography.
Overall, this method gave results consistent with the other viability assays, but provided several advantages over other methods.
With low levels of sequence divergence, as in this data set, this method give results similar to methods that weight paths by the number of synonymous to non-synonymous substitutions [ 9].
Bioline Optima culturing method gave results generally comparable to the NMKL method (SE = 0.49 versus SE= 0.54), results that are reasonable since the only difference between the methods was that we used RVS enrichment broth from different producers.
Both methods give results much better than the classical gradient optimization method.
More suggestions(3)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com