Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
In the P04 + W scenario, the W method generated an extremely large test suite and, to enable test prioritization, we selected random subtest suites containing 2528 test cases.
The proposed method generated an increase in ultimate flexural strength of 62% and 54% for carbon and glass fiber-reinforced epoxy, respectively, and enhanced the out-of-plane properties of both hierarchical systems, as proved by short beam strength test, which showed an improvement of approximately 40% for both.
This method generated an unmatched control group of 1,444 persons.
Our proposed CTA method generated an average sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 91%, and hence performed very well for both categories significantly better than the methods of acceleration (p=0.009) and temperature (p<0.001) alone.
Although the method generated an absolute value (in kb) of mode TL for each sample, it was not particularly sensitive and used a large amount of DNA per sample (~1 µg).
The NuGEN method generated an average cDNA target yield of 2.8 μg from an RNA input of 30 ng, which is within the reported yield range for this assay.
Similar(54)
This method generated a genome-wide 5fC map at single-base resolution.
The QIA method generated a discrete band with a molecular weight similar to that obtained with the CLU method (Fig. 2).
This method generated a population of ∼200,000 age-synchronized animals for small molecule screening.
This method generated a TMDH library comprising around 106 mutants.
The attribute matching method generated a match size >50 in 87% of subjects.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com