Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(3)
Meanwhile, the method gave high selectivity and sensitivity (LODs < 3 μg kg−1 and LOQs < 8.0 μg kg −1), good repeatability (RSD of 9.64%, on average) and precision (RSD of 5.48%, averagely) and excellent stability (RS D<9.47%).
After optimization, the method gave high sensitivity with a method detection limit ranging from 0.0018 to 0.027 ng L−1, good repeatability with a relative standard deviation less than 20% (n = 4) and acceptable recovery with a value mostly exceeding 60%.
In this study the Δ seqA control was the key to understanding that the ChIP-Chip method gave high background (Fig. 4 and 6).
Similar(57)
Polymerization was carried out by both solution and interfacial polycondensation; the latter method gave high-molecular-weight polymers.
Under both deficit irrigation levels (I50 and I75), the normal planting method gave higher total yield and yield components of green pepper than the paired-row planting method.
The time-averaged CT method and cross-sectionally averaged CT method gave similar values for dispersivity (3.57 and 3.89 mm, respectively) while the outflow method gave higher values (4.98 mm).
The EMD-HT method and the FFT-based method produced almost the same natural frequencies but the FFT-based method gave higher modal damping ratios than the EMD-HT method in general.
Cross-validation by a leave-one-stimulus-pair-out method gave higher accuracies than a leave-one-run-out method, suggesting that generalization to independent runs (which more safely ensures independence of the test set) is more challenging than generalization to novel stimuli within the same category.
Figures 1 and 2 showed that the urea melting method gave higher FT catalyst stability and C5+ selectivity.
Crystals obtained in this method gave high-resolution data.
The centered allele coding method gave higher reliabilities than achieved by any of the other allele coding methods.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com