Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(10)
Particularly, this method gave good results in searching critical locations.
The method gave good efficiency for all genes tested, allowing quantification of relative expression levels.
This method gave good results with inorganic pigments but it also allowed us to identify synthetic naphthol colorants.
Under the optimized experimental conditions the method gave good levels of repeatability with coefficient of variation under 11% (n = 10).
The method gave good levels of repeatability with relative standard deviations varying between 2.8 and 8.8% (n = 6).
The LLOQ was 1 ng/mL (S/N > 10), with a precision of 5.88% and accuracy of 97.0% for yakuchinone A. As shown in Table 1, the newly developed method gave good precision and accuracy with the intra- and inter-day assays.
Similar(50)
Proposed method gives good results.
In addition, this method gives good controllability of both growth rate and structure dimension.
As shown in [16], the rank method gives good results in a noiseless environment.
The presented method gives good results in precision in proportion to the number of linearization points.
We find that the holistic Min-Warping method gives good and fast results.
More suggestions(15)
method gave improved
method gives good
method gave best
method gave better
method showed good
method gave consistent
method was good
method gave striking
method provided good
method exhibited good
method gave similar
method gave useful
method demonstrated good
method gave satisfactory
method gave high-molecular-weight
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com