Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
The prevalence found in this reproducibility study was deceptively high (31% Method A, 35% Method B) using a cut-off level of ≥5/9, however this cut-off level was chosen with the 50%-prevalence method for purpose.
Similar(59)
However it is not easy to apply this method for design purpose.
However, it is not easy to apply this method for design purpose due to its complex procedures.
This led them to use the method for purposes other than those originally intended.
Very often researchers restrain themselves to simple linear methods for purposes of interpretability and while sacrificing performance.
The comparison of different methods suggests to use Stouffer's method for this purpose.
We will use an iterative thresholding method for this purpose.
What might be the more appropriate method for this purpose?
This paper presents a method for this purpose.
Here we propose a method for this purpose.
Scattering matrices-based dimension reduction was found to be the more efficient method for the purpose.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com