The performance of our approaches is compared with the performance of two algorithm adaptation methods (Multi-Label k-NN and Multi-Label C4.5) and five problem transformation methods (Binary Relevance, Classifier Chain, Calibrated Label Ranking with majority voting, the Quick Weighted method for pair-wise multi-label learning and the Label Powerset method).
The ηT method for pairing calculation is an efficient computation technique based on a generalisation and optimisation of the Duursma Lee algorithm for calculating the Tate pairing.
Data failing the normality test were analysed by the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis followed by Dunn's method for pair-wise multiple comparisons between groups, and expressed as median values with the 25th and 75th percentiles.
This paper presents a novel method for pair-wise range image registration, a backbone task in world modeling, parts inspection and manufacture, object recognition, pose estimation, robotic navigation, and reverse engineering.
Statistical differences between environmental variables and abundance of plankton at the two sites were tested with the Wilcoxon method for paired samples (Zar 1999).
For any gas that could not be detected in a sample, the level was set to zero Wilcoxon signed-rank test, a non-parametric method for paired data, was used to compare the difference between Broth only and Broth + E. coli, between Blood only and Blood + E. coli, between Broth + E. coli and Blood + E. coli, and between Broth only and Blood only.
The purpose of this study was threefold: to translate and culturally adapt the RAND-36 into Swedish; to evaluate its reliability and responsiveness using Svensson's method for paired ordered categorical data; and to assess the usability of an electronic version of the questionnaire.
The Dunn's method for pair-wise multiple comparison indicated that there was a significant difference between all tag pairs but not between 30M and 40M, which were from the same shark.
We used the Student-Newman-Keuls Method for pair-wise multiple comparison between the different conditions, which yielded significant results for the comparison between the illusion condition and each of the two control conditions (N = 14, p = 0.035 and p = 0.030, respectively), and a non-significant result for the comparison between the two control conditions (N = 14, p = 0.729).
Effect sizes were calculated using the Cohen method for paired samples [ 34].
