Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
TRISS quickly became the standard method for outcome assessment [ 12, 13].
Notably, dermoscopy conducted before treatment confirmed its usefulness in confirming diagnosis and in highlighting specific characteristics of each condition, such as number and calibre of blood vessels, distribution of pigment, and presence of crusts or hairs; thus, it also represents a valid method for outcome assessments [ 34].
Similar(58)
The search for a reliable, valid and cost-effective comorbidity risk adjustment method for outcomes research continues to be a challenge.
Advancement of chronic care research would benefit from more consistent frameworks and methods for outcome assessment.
The choice of methods for outcome assessment can affect study conduct and results.
Moreover, current methods for outcome prediction reviews are unknown to the research community.
Although having a standard outcome has advantages, our more encompassing approach allows us to include studies from wide time periods and different countries with different favoured methods for outcome assessment.
However, the consequences of full standardization of both methods for outcomes in cost-effectiveness analysis and the definition of additional benefit or a fixed cost-effectiveness threshold are difficult to predict because there are too many outcomes that can potentially be used.
This could be because this method for obtaining outcome data, although less likely to obtain data per se, is relatively more likely to obtain outcome data from nonsmokers than smokers.
Although results for primary outcome measures are key determinants of an intervention's benefits or harms profile, we found that the analysis method for primary outcome measures was often undefined in the protocol or altered in the publication.
Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) are the best diagnostic method for predicting outcome in comatose patients.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com