Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
Depending on only one testing method for ideal surface analysis, characterization, and comparison is not possible.
This paper extends the gas-kinetic theory based flux splitting method for ideal magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) equations (K. Xu, 1999, J. Comput. Phys.153, 334) to multidimensional cases.
We conduct long-time simulations with a Hamiltonian particle-mesh method for ideal fluid flow, to determine the statistical mean vorticity field of the discretization.
Designs obtained with this new method for ideal, non-ideal, and azeotropic mixtures give purity and recovery rates close to the specifications, which might be impossible to obtain with a conventional ideal shortcut like the well-known Fenske–Underwood Gilliland shortcut method.
We present a single step, second-order accurate Godunov scheme for ideal MHD which is an extension of the method described in [T.A. Gardiner, J.M. Stone, An unsplit godunov method for ideal MHD via constrained transport, J. Comput. Phys. 205 (2005) 509] to three dimensions.
Here, the 3D modeling of residues predicted to be in transmembrane β-strands is based on the geometric optimization method for ideal barrels as previously described (Chou et al., 1990; Murzin et al., 1994a; b).
Similar(54)
In this paper, we propose and numerically investigate a family of locally divergence-free central discontinuous Galerkin methods for ideal magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) equations.
Li, L. Xu, S. Yakovlev, Central discontinuous Galerkin methods for ideal MHD equations with the exactly divergence-free magnetic field, Journal of Computational Physics 230 (2011) 4828 4847], second and third order exactly divergence-free central discontinuous Galerkin methods were proposed for ideal MHD equations.
We propose a high-order finite difference weighted ENO (WENO) method for the ideal magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) equations.
The results of the method are valid for ideal and non-ideal systems of any number of components.
Existing cultivation methods for producing ideal plants, such as field trials and crop modeling, have some limits.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com