Ai Feedback
Exact(8)
Pretreatment method exhibited higher inhibition in pulmonary metastatic nodule formation compared with the post-treatment method.
Compared with conventional PCR, the LAMP method exhibited higher detection abilities than conventional PCR.
The results established that K-OMS-2 prepared by the refluxing method exhibited higher catalytic activity than that by the solid-state reaction method.
The catalysts prepared by Coprecipitation and Sol-gel method exhibited higher surface area and smaller average particle size in comparison with catalyst prepared by impregnation with TiO2 support.
Meanwhile, the plate-like SAPO-34 catalysts synthesized by this method exhibited higher selectivity to light olefins and longer lifetime in methanol-to-olefins (MTO) reaction than the traditional cubic SAPO-34 catalyst.
Through the comparison with ultra-turrax extraction (UTE) and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) methods, the proposed method exhibited higher yields of five target organic acids in a shorter time.
Similar(52)
The OM method exhibited high error rates, longer completion times, and much fatigue.
The method exhibited high expansion folds and a specific enrichment of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells.
The IPF method exhibited high performance for the M6.5 and M7.3 earthquakes, as did the current method.
The LAMP-LFD method exhibited high specificity and accurately identified K. veneficum algal isolates, but not other algal isolates.
The proposed method exhibited high sensitivity, acceptable stability and reproducibility, and could be extended to detect other protein targets.
Related(17)
approach exhibited higher
procedure exhibited higher
method demonstrated higher
method displayed higher
method display higher
approaches exhibited higher
methods exhibited higher
method provided higher
method obtained higher
method was higher
method recorded higher
method exhibited better
method exhibited larger
method achieved higher
method showed higher
method gave higher
method had higher
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com