Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
The method errors of the variables evaluated by means of linear and angular measurements ranged from 0.22 to 0.69 mm and 0.35° to 2.64°, respectively.
The method errors of the variables evaluated by means of the X-Y coordinate system ranged from 0.22 to 1.23 mm and 0.32 to 1.34 mm, respectively.
The authors who proposed this method reported that the average method errors of the torque values for all teeth were 1.2° and 1.5° for the mandible and the maxilla, respectively [21].
The average method errors of the torque values for all teeth were 1.2° and 1.5° for the mandible and the maxilla, respectively, while the errors of tip values were 2.0° and 1.8° for the mandible and the maxilla, respectively.
Similar(56)
The method error of measurements was calculated using Dahlberg's formula [15]: Method error = √ ∑ d 2 / 2 n.
The method error of this scanner is very small, i.e., 0.05 mm (95% CI 0.03 to 0.07).
These investigators reported a method error of 2.5° and 2.3° on the sagittal and frontal planes, respectively [18].
With the aim of quantifying the full method error of the recordings for each cephalometric parameter, the method of moments variance estimator was used [26, 27].
The CV was determined using the method error of the measurement.
To determine the method error of the cephalometrical measurements, we used the Dahlberg's formula: mean square error S E = Σ d/2 n (d = difference between repeated measurements; n = number of recorded radiographs) [ 20].
However, urinary CrCl had an unacceptably low repeatability, with a within-method error of 55%.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com