Suggestions(5)
Exact(11)
We test our method by simulating the motion of a cylinder moving in a viscous fluid both under forced oscillation, and when tethered to a spring.
We demonstrate the method by simulating data, with and without noise, from a number of biological models described by ordinary differential equations and then estimate the parameters via the proposed technique.
We study the accuracy, efficiency and robustness of our method by simulating Taylor Couette flow, flow induced by a relaxing balloon, flow past single and multiple cylinders, and flow around a flapping wing.
Then the effects of the relative thickness of airfoil on aerodynamic performance are explored, using the above numerical method, by simulating flows around airfoils of different relative thicknesses (12%, 14 %, 16 %, 18, as well as different locations of the maximum relative thickness (x/c = 22%, 26%, 30%, 34%), as a lowellynolds number of 5 × 105.
Genetic algorithm (GA) is a method by simulating Darwin's theory of natural evolution to search for the optimal solution.
We have tested the robustness of the method by simulating tensile tests and calculating Taylor factors for polycrystals of varying textures.
Similar(49)
We illustrate the method by simulated primary drainage in oedometer conditions, highlighting the deformation induced by partial saturation.
A continuous minimization method by simulated annealing [ 40] is used to optimize π, with the objective function being the logarithm likelihood of the alignment.
In a numerical example from geotechnical engineering applications, we illustrate the practical application of our enhanced Material Point and DDMP Methods by simulating a cone penetration.
We further systematically compared two methods by simulating data 50 times.
The effect of build orientation on cylindricity error is analyzed by three methods: first by a simple analytic method, second by simulating the manufactured surface using a CAD (Computer Aided Design) file of the part and third by using an STL (Stereolithography) file.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com