Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Comparisons with the FE results show that the analytical solutions by the Rayleigh Ritz method are reasonably accurate and that the analytical solutions by solving the equations for buckling deformations are exactly the same as the FE results.
Similar(59)
The results from the proposed experimental method were reasonably in agreement with the analytical results.
The comparison of simulations and experimental results indicted that the given design method is reasonably reliable.
Therefore, we may conclude that the method is reasonably robust regarding the choice of a suitable value for α.
Generally, the method is reasonably fast and efficient, but it is difficult to determine best machine settings for a given application.
With the proposed framework, the method is reasonably robust to channel order overestimation and the identifiability condition is simply that the channel impulse response matrix has full column rank.
Figure4 shows that the proposed method is reasonably robust to channel order overestimation since the NMSE increases slowly for each τ as ( L ̂ − L ) increases from 0 to 5. Figure 4 Channel NMSE versus ( L ̂ − L ).
We also demonstrate that the optimization method is reasonably robust to possible inaccuracies in determining NMR parameters of the spin system under study and also in setting the RF-field parameters.
The paper details the application of the numerical method, and demonstrates that the method is reasonably accurate and computationally efficient for a two-dimensional domain subject to nonequilibrium sorption.
Although we found that the method is reasonably robust to violations of four key assumptions, it can be highly sensitive to uneven linkage disequilibrium (LD) between SNPs: contributions to h2 are overestimated from causal variants in regions of high LD and are underestimated in regions of low LD.
The method was reasonably successful in identifying cancer-promoting mutations and determined the effects of specific mutations which could not otherwise be measured experimentally.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com