Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
The mixed method approach allowed a clearer interpretation of the formative and pilot intervention studies.
Our adoption of a mixed method approach allowed us to evaluate significant changes pre-post intervention and at follow-up across conditions, as well as the subjective experience of why each intervention may be helpful or unhelpful, providing insight into the reasons why such interventions might work.
Our trimming method approach allowed us to estimate the SD from the central part of the sample distribution, thus providing an alternative method; the statistical theory behind the calculation is described in the Appendix and it is relatively easy to apply to the data.
Similar(57)
Our multi-method approach allowed us to explore in greater detail motivations behind different feeding practices, and we were able to control for a wider range of socioeconomic variables than previous research (for example [ 36- 38, 51]).
The use of a mixed methods approach allowed for the conformability of data through the process of triangulation [ 50].
Furthermore, the mixed methods approach allowed us not only to quantify discordance and validity measures, but also to elucidate potential reasons for differential variable performance using qualitative feedback.
35 The use of a mixed methods approach allowed for a richer exploration of the barriers to lung screening uptake than quantitative or qualitative analysis alone.
The adoption of a mixed methods approach allowed us to obtain a comparative evaluation of participants' health and well being status, while also providing qualitative feedback on their resettlement experiences.
This mixed methods approach allowed comparison of what was said by different stakeholders with what was observed, increasing confidence in the key findings presented about the role of the CP Coordinator [ 35].
Although poor data quality prevented analysis of utilization data, the mixed methods approach allowed us to estimate quality of care through the availability of a minimum standard of RH services and provider knowledge and attitudes, as well as understand access barriers.
Using a mixed-method approach allows findings to be compared and permits a more complete understanding of the issues that are important to patients.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com