Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Direct comparison of particle counts obtained by the USP microscopy method and light obscuration (or flow microscopy) is however not possible even in the absence of silicon oil due to the differences in sensitivity between the methods (emphasized by the different acceptance criteria defined in the USP Chapter 788).
Similar(59)
A material analysis is however possible in sectioned IOLs using staining methods and light and scanning electron microscopy as well as X-ray spectroscopy.
Possible causes for this difference in BC and EC concentrations could be the presence of fine particles that are "dark", differences in measuring methods, and light absorption by metals.
The absorption and reduced scattering coefficients of internal onion tissues were measured using a combination of measurements on excised onion slices, using the Inverse-Adding Doubling method (IAD), and light transmittance measurements on extracted onion juice.
The dark column belongs to the initial method, and the light column is related to our improved method.
The dark column is related to the initial method, and the light column is related to our modified method.
Produced nanoparticles were diagnosed by UV Vis NIR spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction method, and dynamic light scattering device immediately after production and 1 week after.
This review also reports some experimental results related to image analysis as a two-dimensional method and to light cutting analysis as a three-dimensional method.
The properties of the diluted copolymer solution were studied via 1H NMR, a pyrene-fluorescence probe method and dynamic light scattering.
The density of the composites and the thickness of the pyrocarbon were measured by the Archimedes method and polarized light microscopy, respectively.
Figure 6 Comparison of the perceptual quality of the enhanced speech signals (vertical) by 4 listeners (Horizontal), the dark column: the initial method, and the light column: the modified method.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com