The estimated capacities for maximum method, Van Aerde method, and breakdown method are 2,086, 2,076, and 1,866 veh/h/ln, respectively.
The PLM capacity is compared with the capacity estimated from the maximum method, Van Aerde method, and breakdown method as shown in Table 2.
This section first applies the maximum method, Van Aerde method, and breakdown method to estimate capacity for each day in both data sets.
Specifically, four of the most popular methods are first introduced: Maximum method and Van Aerde method (deterministic) and breakdown method and PLM method (stochastic).
For this case study, three methods (e.g., maximum method, Van Aerde model, and breakdown method) were used to estimate the capacity at the San Diego test site and the Shanghai test site over multiple days.
Open image in new window Fig. 9 Histogram and box plots of estimated capacity at Shanghai by maximum, Van Aerde and breakdown method, respectively.
However, no other studies have been found directly point out the effect of the mechanical dispersion method on the stability and breakdown strength of transformer oil-based nanofluids modified by functionalized nanoparticles.
Field tests such as mini-frac test are the best method for prediction of initiation and breakdown pressure.
In Fig. 6a, the capacities estimated using the maximum capacity, Van Aerde capacity, and Breakdown capacity methods are 2,109, 2,111 and 2,019 veh/h/ln, respectively.
From the data in Fig. 6b, the capacities estimated using the maximum capacity, Van Aerde capacity, and Breakdown capacity methods are 2,360, 1,756 and 2,240 veh/h/ln, respectively.
Open image in new window Fig. 8 Histogram and box plots of estimated capacity by maximum (a), Van Aerde (b), and breakdown (c) Methods at San Diego Test Site.
