Ai Feedback
Exact(17)
Lognormality of the distribution of the reporting ratio was assessed based on a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (α = 0.05).. Confidence intervals for PLM nausea rates were calculated using the Clopper-Pearson exact method, and adjusted for multiple comparisons using Bonferroni adjustment.
The theoretical H/V ratio was calculated using the HVSR method and adjusted 1-D velocity model.
The energies of cation-π interactions and coordinate interactions are calculated using B3LYP/6-31+G d B3LYP/6-31+G dadjusted by empirical method for dispersion energy.
To make a fair comparison of their predictive performance, we used percentile ranking of all predicted DDIs by each method and adjusted their coverage to the size of the iPfam dataset version used by corresponding method.
To identify cDNAs representing genes with significant differences between expression in a given tissue and the overall expression, defined by the expression in the other 22 tissues, we subjected the normalized data to an empirical Bayes method and adjusted the P-values for multiple testing using the false discovery rate ("fdr") method [32].
Protein concentrations were determined using the Bradford method and adjusted to 1 μg/μl.
Similar(43)
By using a highly quantitative method and adjusting for neoplastic cellularity and BRCA1 copy number, we identified patients with homozygous BRCA1 methylation in the ARIEL2 Part 1 PARPi study and observed improved clinical outcomes.
Identical tree topologies were obtained for all major clades using each method, and adjusting the search parameters for each.
Protein concentrations were evaluated using the Bradford method and adjusting protein concentration to 1 μg/μl: 20 μg of each individual sample was separated by 15%% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane.
Analysed by appropriate method (see Methods) and adjusted for age and education.
Confidence intervals (CIs) for prevalence were calculated using jackknife methods and adjusted for clustering of subjects by village (15).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com