Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Table 2 Inter-rater and inter-method agreement Inter-rater agreement Inter-method agreement Trigger error 0.92 [0.91; 0.92] 0.95 [0.94; 0.95] Cycle-off error 0.94 [0.94; 0.95] 0.95 [0.95; 0.96] Inter-rater and method agreements as the intra-class correlation coefficient with a 95% CI.
Similar(59)
In this study, the use of the average of all three 2D CT plane measurements improved the 2D method agreement when compared to the measurement in one single image plane (Table 2).
A method agreement of 0.80 is defined as acceptable[ 40].
Results can be between '0' i.e.: no method agreement at all and '1' i.e.: perfect method agreement.
Assessing agreement in method comparison studies depends on two fundamentally important components; validity (the between method agreement) and reproducibility (the within method agreement).
Whereas, the mutual method agreement averaged over regions, calculated through formula B2, showed virtually no agreement.
Table 6 shows the estimated mutual method agreement (ICC) between the three disciplines.
The overall method agreement, calculated through formula A4, turns out to be 0.70.
The estimated method agreement of clinical judgement of plantar pressures with the GS was below a predominated acceptable level.
The estimated method agreement (ICC) per discipline, is 0.67, 0.65 and 0.76 for podiatrists, pedorthists and orthotists respectively (table 4).
Good overall cross-laboratory, cross-platform, and counting method agreement were achieved in CCQM-P102, with mean CD4+ cell counts in good agreement.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com