Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Using the external magnetic field, the CO2 conversion and selectivity to methanol were increased by factors of 1.7 and 2.24 at 220 °C, respectively.
Similar(59)
The added volume of methanol was increased from 50 150 μL in steps of 50 μL.
For positive ion mode, the initial mobile phase composition was 5% methanol and 95%255 μM ammonium formate solution, which after 3 minutes the percentage methanol was increased at 0.5% per minute for 30 minutes.
The lower critical solution temperature (LCST) of PMEO2MA-stat-POEGMA300 PMEO2MA-stat-POEGMA300 PMEO2MA-stat-POEGMA300f methanol was increased from 0 to 30 vol%, beyond which the LCST could not be quantified.
The proportion of water in methanol was increased to afford 35% water in methanol component that finally gave chloroform (ChlF, 7.05 g) and 35% water (wat2, 2.8 g) fractions after addition of chloroform.
The mobile phase consisted of 50% water and 50% methanol (v/v) for the first 1 min where the methanol was increased from 50%to95%5% methanol over the next 4 min, maintained for an additional 5 min, and the percentage of methanol returned to baseline over the next 8 min.
Levels of the soluble sugars glucose, fructose, galactose and raffinose were increased in the methanol extractives of MYB4-OX lines, by from 1.6- to 3.5-fold.
The methanol concentration was increased from 20%to80%0% over 3 min and kept at 80% methanol for 4 min, then changed back to 20% methanol in 1 min followed by a re-equilibration phase of 7 min at 20% methanol.
In this first approach to obtain recombinant Bm86, Bd86 and Ba86 secreted to the culture medium, methanol was supplied at 1 ml·h-1·L of the initial fermentation volume for the first two hrs and then methanol supply was increased in 10% increments every 30 min to a rate of 3 ml·h-1·L.
When methanol percentage was increased, the molecular binding that could inhibit ionization of molecules was occurred.
During the first 17 min methanol concentration was increased to 100%% starting at 80%%.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com