Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(10)
Methane may be burned to release energy.
Methane may be a cleaner-burning fossil fuel than coal or oil but will still release many tons of CO2.
We recently found clues that the natural gas methane may be percolating up from the sea floor in large quantities.
Their exhalations, oxygen, did for both methanogens and methane and created an atmosphere similar to the one that exists now.The main upshot is that although oxygen is unquestionably a biomarker (it is so reactive that it would vanish from any atmosphere unless constantly replenished) methane may be one, too.
While methane enrichment and depletion of hydrogen are indicators for methanogenesis, some of the methane may be metabolized shallower in the system prior to venting by aerobic or anaerobic respiration (Figure 1).
The presence of methanogenic reads in Yumthang spring indicates methane may be derived from deeply buried carbon-bearing rocks or it could be produced in the near surface by organic matter fermentation (Whiticar 1986).
Similar(50)
Our results suggest that livestock methane emissions, while not the dominant overall source of global methane emissions, may be a major contributor to the observed annual emissions increases over the 2000s to 2010s.
But while methane hydrate may be cleaner than coal or oil, it is still a hydrocarbon, and burning methane creates CO2.
Methane emissions may be higher than the "official" estimate, but the panel concludes that their assessment "still supports robust climate benefits from [natural gas] substitution for coal in the power sector".
PFS had the lowest redox potential (which would not favor aerobic CH4 oxidation), yet it had the highest PMO rates, suggesting anaerobic methane oxidizers may be important in flooded soils.
Selexol and the ionic liquid have similar selectivity of sulfur compounds with respect to methane and may be used at elevated pressures and temperatures since both have low vapor pressures.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com