Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Similar(60)
We experimentally present an acoustic metasurface (AMS) with sub-wavelength thickness based on the meta-molecule consisting of eight different sized double-split hollow spheres (DSHSs).
The 2D-ECM is theoretically investigated by incident beam angles and meta-molecules unit sizes in visible spectrums.
The incoming light at the FF induces in each meta-molecule a nonlinear SHG dipole, which generates the measured signal.
The plasmonic meta-surface consists of two interspersed lattices of chiral meta-molecules with opposite chirality.
The amplitude of the nonlinear dipoles excited by optical frequency ω is given by, where a = or corresponds to the chiral centers (meta-molecules), b = L or R corresponds to the direction of circularly polarized light and are coupling coefficients.
We tune the SHG-CD by simply tuning d and ensuring that the circularly polarized light does not couple with the same efficiency to the two types of chiral meta-molecules.
For a large number of randomly oriented chiral molecules deposited within the chiral center of the meta-molecules, we can expect the linear molecular response to increase by 100%, compared to that for circularly polarized light, regardless of whether the molecules are mobile within a liquid or immobilized on the meta-surface.
(c) Amplitude and phase of the transmission through the HOMO and LUMO of a meta-OPV3 molecule.
In conclusion, we have shown that the low-bias conductance through a single meta-OPV3 molecule is one order of magnitude smaller that through a para-OPV3 one.
Using the break-junction technique, we find that the conductance for a single meta-OPV3 molecule wired between gold electrodes is one order of magnitude smaller than that of a para-OPV3 molecule.
For meta-OPV3 molecule, the phase shift results in destructive interference between the HOMO and LUMO transmission, as evident from the drop in the full transmission plot (Figure 4a).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com