Suggestions(1)
Similar(60)
Third, the government argues that the collection and storage of bulk telephony meta-data does not seriously intrude on individual privacy because the nature of the information at issue -- mere calling data -- does not itself reveal anything particularly private.
With respect to the government's third argument -- that the collection of bulk telephony meta-data does not seriously threaten individual privacy because it involves only transactional information, the Review Group agreed that the intrusion on privacy would be greater if the government collected the content of every telephone call than if it collects only the meta-data.
We therefore concluded that the limitation of the program only to telephone meta-data did not eliminate potentially serious concerns about individual privacy.
However, it is not one of the strongest genetic risk factors for PD and only after large meta-analysis of data, does it become statistically significant (14).
A specific review [ 67] and the taxane meta-analysis data do not support the view that the efficacy of taxanes is significantly related to hormone receptor status.
A previous review focusing on the elderly did not provide meta-analytic data, did not examine higher levels of haemoglobin and did not focus on dementia or cognitive decline [ 18].
Furthermore, data does not «live alone,» but has a «partner»: Meta- data.
On the whole, meta-analysis of available data did not demonstrate a general survival benefit for either strategy [ 3, 11- 15].
These meta-analyses of published data did not evidence an increased risk of serious infections for patients with RA treated by rituximab or abatacept.
In agreement with previous meta-analysis, the present data did not demonstrate reduction of bleeding, false route, development of subcutaneous emphysema, occurrence of pneumothorax, and oxygen desaturation during PT when compared with ST [ 6– 8, 49].
Meta-analyses of such outcome data do not allow elucidation of mechanisms.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com