met standards for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "met standards for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when indicating that something has achieved or fulfilled specific criteria or requirements. Example: "The product has met standards for safety and quality, ensuring it is suitable for consumer use."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

19 human-written examples

Testing companies are supposed to conduct a variety of exams to make sure that concrete was properly mixed and met standards for strength and durability.

The New York Times

The department concluded on April 14 that the company met standards for doing business with the Government, despite past penalties for selling tainted meat and poultry.

The New York Times

A sample taken near the intake for the water supply of Kingston met standards for drinking water, said Gilbert Francis Jr., a spokesman for the authority.

The New York Times

On the New York State English Language Arts Assessment Tests for 2008-09, the latest year for which figures were available, 75 percent of students in Grades 5, 6 and 7 at Haverstraw Middle School met or exceeded proficiency standards for English Language Arts, and 89 percent met standards for math, compared with an average of 80 percent statewide and 90 percent respectively.

The New York Times

The ordeal of his patient, Dr. Gedz, prompted the agency to fine the hospital $14,000 two weeks ago and to order outside monitoring -- a highly unusual level of oversight -- to ensure that the hospital met standards for quality of care.

The New York Times

In February, the agency fined Beth Israel Medical Center $14,000 and ordered outside monitoring to ensure it met standards for quality of care after an obstetrician carved his initials onto the abdomen of a patient on whom he had just performed a Caesarean section.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

41 human-written examples

Among other problems, the bay, including its tidal rivers, does not meet standards for dissolved oxygen.

The New York Times

Under the WFD, the Fendrod fails to meet standards for ecotoxic zinc, cadmium and manganese.

Nature

Some produce goes unpicked because it doesn't meet standards for shape and color.

The Washington Post

The lab meets standards for laboratory services required by the New York State Department of Health.

Cornell University

At Oklahoma State University, our student-athletes must meet standards for admittance whether they are from accredited or unaccredited high schools.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "met standards for", ensure you clearly specify what those standards are, providing context to avoid ambiguity. For example, instead of just saying "the product met standards", specify "the product met standards for safety and durability".

Common error

A common mistake is to use "met standards for" without clearly stating what standards were met. Always provide specific details about the standards in question to give the statement meaning and credibility. Avoid vague statements like "it met standards", and instead use a clear, specific statement such as "it "met standards for emission control"".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "met standards for" functions as a declarative statement indicating that a subject has fulfilled specific criteria or requirements. As Ludwig AI pointed out, the phrase is correct and usable in written English. The examples demonstrate its use across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

32%

Science

48%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Academia

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "met standards for" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to indicate that a subject has fulfilled particular criteria or benchmarks. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and usable in written English. Its frequency is "common", with prominent usage in "News & Media", and "Science". When using this phrase, it's important to explicitly define what standards were met to maintain clarity. Alternatives like "complied with requirements for" and "satisfied the criteria for" offer similar meanings. By providing clear context and specific standards, the writer can avoid vagueness, enhancing the statement's credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

complied with requirements for

Replaces "standards" with "requirements" and "met" with "complied with", emphasizing adherence to specific needs.

satisfied the criteria for

Substitutes "standards" with "criteria" and "met" with "satisfied", highlighting the fulfillment of specific conditions.

fulfilled the requirements for

Similar to "complied with requirements", it emphasizes the completion and satisfaction of mandatory needs.

conformed to specifications for

Uses "conformed" instead of "met" and "specifications" instead of "standards", focusing on alignment with detailed technical requirements.

reached the benchmark for

Emphasizes achieving a specific performance level by using "benchmark" instead of "standards".

achieved the grade for

Focuses on attaining a specific quality level, using "grade" to denote a defined level of quality or performance.

adhered to regulations for

Highlights obedience to specific rules and guidelines, using "regulations" instead of "standards".

observed the guidelines for

Implies following a set of recommendations, using "guidelines" instead of mandatory "standards".

lived up to expectations for

Focuses on meeting anticipated outcomes, replacing the objective "standards" with subjective "expectations".

measured up to the mark for

Emphasizes reaching a required level or standard, using a more idiomatic expression.

FAQs

What does "met standards for" mean?

The phrase "met standards for" indicates that something has achieved or fulfilled specific requirements, criteria, or benchmarks that have been established, for example, "The building "met standards for accessibility"".

How can I use "met standards for" in a sentence?

You can use "met standards for" to describe a product, service, or performance that has satisfied particular criteria. For example, "The water sample "met standards for drinking water"", or "The hospital "met standards for quality of care"".

What are some alternatives to "met standards for"?

Some alternatives include "complied with requirements for", "satisfied the criteria for", or "conformed to specifications for". For example, instead of "The product met standards for safety", you could say "The product "complied with requirements for safety"".

Is it better to say "met standards for" or "meets standards for"?

The choice between "met standards for" and "meets standards for" depends on the tense you need to convey. "Met standards for" is past tense, indicating that the standards were achieved in the past. "Meets standards for" is present tense, indicating that the standards are currently being achieved or are generally achieved. For example, "The product "meets standards for safety"" implies it consistently does so.