Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(24)
For the 61 articles that met our study criteria, one investigator (LC) originally abstracted data about the relationship between ADs and cancer and another (LS for the epidemiological studies, DC for the pre-clinical ones) independently reviewed the data.
Thus, 24,293 patients met our study criteria.
After full-text screening, 27 publications met our study eligibility criteria.
We were unable to identify a commercially available tracking registry that met our study requirements.
Through a comprehensive literature review we identified 245 health care interventions that met our study criteria.
A total of 2812 participants met our study entry criteria and were invited to participate in this study.
Similar(36)
Of these, 30 were excluded following a full-text review because they did not meet our study inclusion criteria.
These reasons may partly explain that we did not meet our study objectives.
A total of 65 studies were identified once we removed responses that did not meet our study criteria.
To meet our study objectives and the availability of existing data, we focused primarily on (ii) and (iii) above.
506 possible studies were assessed against our inclusion criteria with 17 studies (19 papers) finally identified as meeting our study inclusion criteria.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com