Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(21)
In the study by Washburn and colleagues [ 52] patients rarely met criterion B without also meeting criterion C. Criterion B was further found to be associated with interpersonal functions of NSSI [ 53].
On a test of readability, none of the behavior plans met criterion on all 12 critical readability variables.
The adjusted GOF value for the validation set met criterion and even exceeded expectations as it was lower than the GOF value for the calibration set with a value of 1.159 compared to 1.30, respectively, confirming model validation.
Of those with self-injury, 81 98% [ 23, 51– 53] met criterion C and 82.4% of self-injuring community adults met criterion C1 [ 55].
A total of 41.8% met criterion for exhaustion only, 6.7% met criterion for shrinkage only and 14.4% met criteria for both.
*Sum of individual internal validity criterion rating (1 = study met criterion; 0 otherwise; maximum score: 4).
Similar(38)
Only one patient met criteria for thrombolysis.
One hundred and fifty of 240 questionnaires met criteria.
Of these, 17 met criteria for inclusion.
Two patients met criteria for remission [ 15].
Thirty-six articles met criteria for further analysis.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com