met at

USAGE SUMMARY

'met at' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to specify the location at which two or more people met. For example, "My friends and I met at the park yesterday."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Caucus met at 7pm.

The Guardian

They met at a bar.

The New York Times - Sports

They met at a party.

The Economist

We met at his apartment.

The New Yorker

The men met at work.

The New York Times

Congress met at the Capitol.

The New Yorker

Delbanco: "We met at elevenish.

The New Yorker

We met at the park.

The New Yorker

They met at a Bach festival".

The New Yorker

(They met at a Brooklyn hacker space).

The New York Times - Arts

Nobody met at stations in Sheffield.

The Guardian - Music

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing initial meetings, use "met at" followed by a specific location. For instance, "They met at the library" is clearer than "They met."

Common error

Don't just say "They "met at" a place". Specify the place to provide context and clarity for your readers.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "met at" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a verb, typically specifying the location where an encounter or meeting took place. As confirmed by Ludwig, it's a grammatically sound way to indicate the site of a meeting.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "met at" is a grammatically correct and very common way to specify the location where a meeting or encounter occurred. As Ludwig confirms, it's perfectly usable in written English. It's most frequently found in news and media contexts. When using "met at", ensure you provide a specific location to enhance clarity. Consider alternatives like "encountered at" or "gathered at" for stylistic variation. Remember to avoid vague descriptions. Ludwig's analysis underscores the phrase's versatility and widespread acceptance in both formal and informal communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

encountered at

This alternative focuses on the act of encountering someone in a particular location, with a slightly more formal tone.

connected at

This implies a relationship or bond was established when meeting in a specific place.

gathered at

This suggests a planned meeting or assembly of people at a particular location.

converged at

This indicates that people came together from different directions to meet at a specific place.

assembled at

This suggests a more formal or organized gathering at a specified location.

crossed paths at

This conveys a sense of chance or destiny in meeting someone at a specific location.

knew each other from

This implies previous knowledge of the person, and the location specifies where they initially connected.

first saw each other at

This emphasizes the initial visual encounter at a certain place.

had their first encounter at

This is a more descriptive way of saying they met for the first time at a specific place.

were introduced at

This emphasizes that their meeting was facilitated by someone else at that particular location.

FAQs

How do I use "met at" in a sentence?

Use "met at" to specify the location where individuals encountered each other. For example, "We "met at the conference"" or "They "met at the party"".

What can I say instead of "met at"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "encountered at", "connected at" or "gathered at" to convey a similar meaning.

Is it correct to say "We met in" instead of "We met at"?

Both "met in" and "met at" can be correct, but they imply different things. "Met at" is used for specific locations (e.g., "We "met at the park""), while "met in" is generally used for broader locations like cities or countries (e.g., "We "met in Paris"").

What's the difference between "met at" and "met with"?

"Met at" indicates the place where people encountered each other. "Met with" implies a scheduled meeting or appointment, regardless of the location. For example, "We "met at the cafe"" versus "We "met with the client" to discuss the project".