merger with

USAGE SUMMARY

"merger with" is a valid phrase that is used in written English.
It implies that one entity is joining or combining with another entity. For example, "The company announced its merger with a larger rival in the industry."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

One idea, a merger with Ford, is improbable.

The Economist

Euronext merger with Deutsche Börse.

The New York Times

They called for a merger with Egypt.

The New York Times

So how about a merger with Merck?

The Economist

Another possibility is a merger with Glencore.

The Economist

Q Why the merger with Colliers?

The New York Times

Medical Center's merger with Mount Sinai Medical Center".

The New York Times

This blocked Marconi's potential merger with Thomson.

The Economist

Any kind of merger with Five?

The Guardian

Announced merger with al-Qaida in Iraq.

The Guardian

Indeed, SBC's merger with UBS creates one such monster.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Be specific about the entities involved in the "merger with", providing names and relevant details to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "merger with" when one company is clearly acquiring another. A "merger with" implies a more equal partnership, whereas an acquisition involves one company taking over another.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "merger with" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically used as an adjective to modify a noun. It indicates that something is involved in, or related to, a merger involving a specific entity. Ludwig AI confirms this is a valid phrase in English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

30%

Science

20%

Less common in

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "merger with" is a common and grammatically sound way to describe the combination of two or more entities, primarily in business and financial contexts. According to Ludwig AI, it is a valid phrase in written English. It's most frequently encountered in news and media outlets, as well as formal business communications. When using this phrase, it's important to differentiate it from "acquisition", as a "merger with" implies a more equal partnership. Alternative phrases such as "integration with", "consolidation with", and "alliance with" can be used depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey. In summary, the phrase "merger with" is a useful tool for discussing corporate strategy and restructuring, provided it is used accurately and appropriately.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

integration with

Focuses on the process of combining systems or entities into a unified whole, rather than the specific legal or financial aspect of a merger.

combination with

Implies the blending of two or more things together, often to enhance or improve the overall result.

consolidation with

Emphasizes the streamlining and strengthening effect of combining resources or operations.

amalgamation with

Denotes the process of combining or uniting multiple entities or substances into a cohesive whole, focusing on the resulting blend or mixture.

alliance with

Highlights a cooperative agreement between entities, often less permanent or legally binding than a merger.

affiliation with

Indicates a formal association or connection, which may not involve a complete merging of operations.

incorporation into

Suggests that one entity is absorbed into another, losing its separate identity.

absorption into

Implies a complete assimilation of one entity by another, often indicating a loss of distinct identity.

joining with

A more general term for combining efforts or resources, lacking the specific legal and financial connotations of "merger".

linkage with

Highlights the establishment of a connection or association between two or more entities, often emphasizing the interdependence or collaboration that results.

FAQs

How is "merger with" used in business contexts?

In business, "merger with" describes the combining of two or more companies into a single entity. It's often used in financial news and corporate communications to explain strategic alliances and restructurings.

What are some alternatives to "merger with"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "integration with", "consolidation with", or "alliance with" to convey similar meanings.

How does a "merger with" differ from an acquisition?

A "merger with" generally implies a mutual agreement between two companies to combine, creating a new entity. An acquisition, on the other hand, involves one company purchasing and taking control of another.

Is "merger with" grammatically correct?

Yes, "merger with" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase in English. It functions as a prepositional phrase that describes the act of merging with another entity.