merged with

USAGE SUMMARY

"merged with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe the joining of two entities together. For example: "The two companies merged with each other to form a new company."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

merged with Euronext.

The New York Times

Elsevier merged with Reed instead.

The Economist

(Ticketmaster merged with Live Nation in 2010).

The New York Times

Sears merged with Kmart in 2005.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Penguin ultimately merged with Bertelsmann's Random House.

The New York Times

Valeant merged with Biovail last year.

The New York Times

It merged with Delta in 1972.

Encyclopedia Britannica

I merged with the pouring water.

Independent

"The qipao merged with Western dress.

The New York Times

McDonnell Douglas merged with Boeing in 1997.

The New York Times

KNILM merged with KLM in 1945.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "merged with" to clearly indicate that two entities have combined to form a single entity. Ensure that the context provides clarity on the nature and purpose of the merger.

Common error

Avoid using "merged with" when you simply mean that two things are associated or related. "Merged with" implies a formal combination, not just a connection.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "merged with" functions as a prepositional phrase, specifically indicating the result of a merger or combination. It is used to describe how two separate entities have become one. Ludwig AI confirms that this usage is both grammatically correct and widely accepted.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Encyclopedias

20%

Science

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "merged with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used prepositional phrase that indicates the combination of two or more entities. As Ludwig AI confirms, its use is appropriate across various contexts, ranging from news and media to encyclopedias and scientific publications. It's important to use this phrase when you want to express a formal combination, rather than a simple association. For alternatives, you can consider phrases like "combined with", "integrated with", or "consolidated with", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey. Avoiding confusion with simpler associations is key to correct usage.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

combined with

Focuses on the act of combination, often implying a more general or equal partnership.

integrated with

Emphasizes the blending and unification of different elements into a cohesive whole.

consolidated with

Highlights the strengthening and streamlining that results from the joining of entities.

amalgamated with

Suggests a more complete and thorough blending, often used in formal or technical contexts.

united with

Implies a coming together for a common purpose or goal, often with a sense of solidarity.

fused with

Emphasizes the irreversible and inseparable nature of the joining.

linked with

Focuses on the connection or association between two entities, without necessarily implying a full merger.

associated with

Suggests a looser connection or relationship, often implying a correlation rather than a direct merging.

incorporated into

Highlights the absorption of one entity into a larger or more dominant one.

became one with

A more poetic or figurative way of expressing a complete and harmonious merging.

FAQs

What does "merged with" mean?

"Merged with" means that two or more entities have combined to form a single entity. This is commonly used in the context of business, but can also apply to other areas.

How is "merged with" used in a sentence?

You can use "merged with" to describe the combination of two companies, organizations, or even ideas. For example, "Company A "combined with" Company B to create a new entity".

What are some alternatives to "merged with"?

Some alternatives to "merged with" include "combined with", "integrated with", or "consolidated with". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "merged into" instead of "merged with"?

While both "merged with" and "merged into" can be used to describe a combination, "merged with" emphasizes the joining of two entities, while "merged into" emphasizes the absorption of one entity by another.