merely for completeness

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "merely for completeness" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when you want to indicate that something is being included or mentioned just to ensure that all aspects are covered, even if it may not be essential. Example: "I will include the previous findings in this report, merely for completeness, even though they do not significantly impact the current conclusions."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Other than noting a single EST extending the conservation to cartilaginous fish [GenBank: CV798132], we include it here merely for completeness.

BMC Genomics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

"I don't like giving details of the children, but for completeness, I did that," he said.

The Guardian - Opinion

We repeat them just for completeness.

Journal of Inequalities and Applications

This, according to the BHA, was merely for "the sake of completeness", but another slew of global headlines has inevitably linked "steroids" to "Godolphin", which was conceived by Sheikh Mohammed to project a positive image of Dubai around the world.

The Guardian - Sport

The cost of those projects was not available, the department said, "but they have been included for completeness".

The Guardian

She recognizes her own "thirst for completeness and wholeness," but becomes increasingly aware that this thirst cannot be quenched.

The New York Times - Books

But the trial transcripts substituted drama for completeness.

The New York Times

(For completeness: I don't own or control any stock).

The Guardian

Maybe two days later, we started looking for completeness, for connections.

The New Yorker

You rarely succeed, yet the urge for completeness is a kind of love, doomed to be outgrown but not forgotten.

The New Yorker

For completeness, I should also mention Elite 4, about which there is an official FAQ dated 2000,2001.

The Guardian - Tech

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "merely for completeness" to signal that information is included to ensure thoroughness, even if it's not strictly essential to the main point. This clarifies your intent and prevents potential confusion about its relevance.

Common error

Avoid using "merely for completeness" too frequently, as it can make your writing sound repetitive and undermine the perceived importance of the included information. Use it judiciously when clarity is truly needed.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "merely for completeness" functions as an adverbial phrase, modifying a verb or clause to indicate the reason for including certain information. It clarifies that the inclusion is primarily for the sake of thoroughness rather than essential relevance. As Ludwig AI confirms, this is a valid use.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

30%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

7%

Wiki

7%

Reference

6%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "merely for completeness" is a grammatically correct adverbial phrase used to indicate that information is included primarily for the sake of thoroughness. While Ludwig AI confirms its usability, it's important to use the phrase judiciously to avoid redundancy. Its usage spans across various contexts, including scientific, news, and formal writing, with a tendency towards neutral to formal registers. Alternatives like "simply for completeness" or "just for the sake of completeness" offer similar meanings. When including information "merely for completeness", be sure to signal this intent to readers, preventing any confusion about its central relevance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

simply for completeness

Replaces "merely" with "simply", offering a slightly less formal tone while maintaining the same core meaning.

just for the sake of completeness

Emphasizes the reason for inclusion, focusing on ensuring completeness as the primary motivation.

for the sake of thoroughness

Shifts the focus from completeness to thoroughness, implying a more detailed and careful approach.

for record purposes

Highlights the intention of documenting something for future reference, rather than ensuring overall completeness.

to ensure full coverage

Focuses on ensuring that all aspects are covered, highlighting comprehensiveness.

to be comprehensive

Highlights the intention to be comprehensive on the topic, but not on completeness.

for comprehensive purposes

Similar to 'to be comprehensive' but in this form acts as a modifier

for documentation purposes

Focuses more on the documentation than on the completeness or the topic itself.

as a matter of course

Indicates that something is included as a standard procedure, not necessarily for completeness but as a routine practice.

for good measure

Suggests adding something extra, which is related to completeness, but not the same thing.

FAQs

What does "merely for completeness" mean?

The phrase "merely for completeness" means that something is included or mentioned only to ensure that all aspects are covered, even if it's not essential or directly relevant to the main point.

When is it appropriate to use "merely for completeness" in writing?

Use "merely for completeness" when you want to signal that certain information is being included for thoroughness, but it's not critical to the core argument or analysis. It helps manage the reader's expectations about the information's importance.

Are there alternatives to saying "merely for completeness"?

Yes, you can use phrases like "simply for completeness", "just for the sake of completeness", or "for the sake of thoroughness" to convey a similar meaning.

How can I use "merely for completeness" in a sentence?

You can say, "I am including this data, "merely for completeness", even though it doesn't significantly alter the overall findings." This indicates that the data is supplemental but not crucial.