Suggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Kinetic tests with 1 ppm mercury solutions and TP-214 were performed as well.
Adsorption experiments were conducted using different amounts of TCPEI, namely 0.03, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, and 1.0 g, and synthetic standard mercury solutions of 40 mg L−1 at room temperature and fixed time.
Mercury solutions were prepared by diluting a 1000 mg/L certified solution (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany).
Similar(56)
A 50.00 ppm mercury solution at pH 4.0 may be reduced to a concentration of 0.02 ppm (99.97% mercury removal) and to 0.02 ppm (99.97% mercury removal) at a pH of 6.0.
Batch kinetic tests were carried out in a sealed flask at a fixed ratio (3 g/L) of adsorbent mass to volume of the mercury solution (10 and 100 ppm).
Batch adsorption tests were carried out by adding a fixed amount of adsorbent (150 mg) into a number of sealed glass flasks containing 50 mL of mercury solution of different concentrations (0 to 900 ppm) without changing the pH.
FTIR surface infrared spectroscopy of the mercury solution interface shows the adsorption of complex ions of mercury thiocyanate at potentials more positive than −200mV vs SCE, and indicates that thiocyanate ion is adsorbed by electrostatic physiadsorption at more negative potentials.
The efficiency of mercury adsorption on HMAS was studied regarding the pH of mercury solution, initial mercury concentration, and the reaction temperature.
The adsorption of mercury was investigated on HMAS regarding the pH of mercury solution, initial mercury concentration, and the reaction temperature.
Batch adsorption experiments were conducted to test the effect of different parameters such as the pH of mercury solution, initial mercury concentration and reaction temperature on mercury adsorption by HMAS.
A calibration curve ranging from 10 to 200 picograms mercury/g was constructed using gravimetric dilutions (2 M hydrochloric acid described above) of a primary standard mercury solution (GFS Chemicals).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com