Sentence examples for mentions compared with from inspiring English sources

China is mentioned 23 times in the document, almost twice as many mentions compared with the Obama administration's last version of the strategy.

Mr. Danforth had 10 mentions, compared with 49 for Gov. Tom Ridge of Pennsylvania, No. 1 on the 53-name list.

He mentions "fake news" the most during the hours in which morning shows air (21 mentions, compared with eight mentions at other times) and the more positive messages of "great" and "America" during non-morning show hours (32 and 21 mentions, respectively, compared with 20 and 10 during the morning).

According to data revealed today, Twitter is the network of choice for sharing information related to the protests, with 82.5% of the mentions, compared with just 2.8% on Facebook, 0.5% on YouTube and 12.5% on personal blogs.

For sepsis-associated deaths, 23.2% have five or more conditions mentioned, compared with 7.2% of all deaths.

Despite his lowly finish, Earnhardt was the most mentioned driver on the Fox telecast with 91 mentions, compared to 86 for winner Trevor Bayne, according to Joyce Julius & Associates.

He tweets about Fox and the New York Times at all times of the day, but these appear most frequently in the morning (14 and eight morning mentions, respectively, compared with six and four mentions at other times).

In addition, a reanalysis of the RE-LY trial mentions that compared with the median Ctrough concentration of 88 ng/mL, the rate of major bleeding doubled at a concentration of 210 ng/mL [ 16].

In August and September, about 7percentt of Republican television ads mentioned Pelosi, compared with 10percentt of Democratic ads that mentioned Trump, according to the Wesleyan Media Project, which has ranked Pelosi as the most mentioned congressional leader in campaign ads in every cycle since 2010.

More of those on higher than lower incomes mentioned positive thinking: 26% = 64 of those earning £23 400+ mentioned this compared with 23% = 40 of those earning £14 560–£23 399, 14% = 29 of those on £8320 £14 559 and 17% = 42 of those earning less than this (chi-square 11.971, 3 d.f., P = 0.007).

The results showed that sampling from an arbitrarily selected sampling spot is the worst strategy, requiring much more individual analyses to achieve the above mentioned criteria compared with the other two approaches.