"mental features" is a correct and common phrase used in written English.
It refers to the characteristics or traits of a person's mind or thought processes. Example: "The novel explores the main character's complex mental features, delving into the depths of his psyche and revealing his innermost thoughts and emotions."
According to this alternative way of formulating disjunctivism, the disjunctivist holds that veridical perceptions and hallucinations differ mentally in some significant respect i.e., there are certain mental features that veridical perceptions have that hallucinations cannot have.
For now we can at least say that the minimal commitment of a view that can be labelled a disjunctivist theory of perception is that veridical perceptions and hallucinations differ mentally in some significant respect i.e., there are certain mental features that veridical perceptions have that hallucinations cannot have.
Both Carnap and Ryle emphasized that many mental features or properties have a dispositional character.
Derived from the Greek anthropos ("human") and morphe ("form"), the term was first used to refer to the attribution of human physical or mental features to deities.
There is also disagreement about what mental features need to be inherited.
As complexity increases physical and/or mental features emerge from the neutral basis.
If the disjunctivist about X makes the additional claim that the particular mental feature, X, that is unique to the case of veridical perception is essential to the fundamental kind of mental event it is, then they will also be a fundamental kind disjunctivist.
Rather than require a further act of awareness, some acquaintance theorists add constraints to the nature of the foundational belief or the manner in which it is formed so that acquaintance with some mental state or mental feature provides part of the content of the belief itself, and does so in such a way as to guarantee the truth of the belief.
For example, although there may be a context in which it suits our purposes to group together the beliefs of a subject that are true, it is not generally thought that a belief's being true is a mental feature of that state.
So we can mark some of the differences between views that fall under the disjunctivist label by invoking the notion of 'disjunctivism about X', where X is the relevant mental feature that it is claimed differs in cases of veridical perception and hallucination.
Categories are also thought to be extra-mental features that things about which we think and speak have–call them properties such as the properties of being a quality or of being a relation.
