Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(10)
The diagnosis of meningitis was based on isolation of a bacterium in one cerebrospinal fluid culture, as reiterated by Mayhall et al. [2].
Until recently, the laboratory confirmation of viral meningitis was based upon isolation of the causative agent in cell cultures.
The diagnosis of meningitis was based on compatible clinical features and cerebrospinal fluid analysis.
Diagnosis of bacterial meningitis was based on a positive result of CSF culture.
The diagnosis of meningitis was based on S. pneumoniae identified in CSF through culture.
Third, the diagnosis of meningitis was based on CSF white cell count, and therefore may have been overestimated.
Similar(50)
Many times the diagnosis of viral meningitis is based only on clinical criteria and conventional laboratory methods.
For example, the 5 1 ratio of Hib pneumonia to meningitis, which was based on the results of two randomized controlled vaccine trials in The Gambia and Chile, may not apply to all parts of the world (5, 6 ).
The diagnosis of AIDS was based on the presence of cytomegalovirus retinitis, cryptococcal meningitis, or skin rash with weight loss.
The brief text was based on a review of 180 patients with tuberculous meningitis in India [ 34].
In the Netherlands, until 2005, information was based on data from 15 regional public health laboratories that cover an estimated 44% of the population and from the Netherlands Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis, which receives isolates from patients with meningitis or septicemia.
More suggestions(15)
meningitis was suspected
meningitis was treated
meningitis was observed
meningitis was made
meningitis was begun
meningitis was classified
meningitis was estimated
meningitis was confirmed
meningitis was defined
meningitis was seen
meningitis was determined
meningitis was complicated
meningitis was reported
meningitis was diagnosed
meningitis was found
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com