Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(4)
For men, the regression was nonsignificant.
For the older men, the regression analyses for each of the model constructs found 29 of the IBM construct beliefs were significant predictors of intention (Table 7).
BMI was positively and significantly associated with E/A ratio in women; in men, the regression coefficient was of similar magnitude but did not reach significance.
In men, the regression coefficients (per decade of urban life) were 2.5% in the first decade and 0.1% thereafter for body fat; 1.4 mm Hg for systolic blood pressure; and 7% for fasting insulin.
Similar(56)
For the younger men, the five regression analyses for each of the model constructs found 31 of the IBM construct beliefs were significant predictors of intention (Table 7).
(2) numbers in parentheses at the first column are number of observations of women and men included in the regression models, respectively.
In the present study, obvious gender-related differences were observed as well (in agreement with the previous studies) which led to the study design including gender stratification analysis (with a men focus in the regression analysis).
For men, the results of regression analyses for psychological distress showed that having a higher level of needs predicted a greater level of psychological distress.
For the rural men the five stepwise regression analyses conducted for the model constructs found a total of 28 of the IBM construct beliefs to be significant predictors of intention (Table 5).
A total of 11 studies (12 reports because 1 study reported results separately for men and women) ran the regression models using depression as the dependent variable, and the pooled OR was 1.27 (95% CI 1.07 1.51) with a moderate to high heterogeneity detected (I = 60.9%) (Supplementary Fig. 3).
Overall, and in both men and women, the regressions confirm the observation that trends in "excellent" ratings are more consistent across surveys than trends in "fair/poor" ratings.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com