Sentence examples for men coefficient from inspiring English sources

No modifiers were found when adjusting for the following variables: proportion of men (coefficient, −0.074; p=0.08), mean age of treated patients at inclusion (coefficient, 0.020; p=0.94), mean age of untreated patients at inclusion (coefficient, 0.121; proportionroportion with cirrhosis at inclusion (coefficient, −0.001; p=0.76) and region of trial (coefficient −0.394; p=0.55).

If the fixed effect for women (vs men) is a and the random effect for women by practice random effects has a variance of b, approximately 95% of practices will have women (vs men) coefficients between a-1.96×sqrt(b) and a+1.96×sqrt(b).

Using a Reynolds dependent formulation for the Manning coefficient improves model predictions.

However, the calibrated Manning coefficient in the rectangular channel model was ∼2/3 greater than the likely physically realistic value for this reach and this erroneously slowed wave propagation times through the reach by several hours.

The relation between the Manning coefficient and the water depth and rainfall intensity has been quantified using different methodologies based on the analysis of two sets of experimental data.

Furthermore, the article aims to establish a link between the Manning coefficient and the physical roughness of the shotcrete-lined tunnel with invert concrete and to establish a link between over-break thickness and physical roughness.

where C is the Chézy coefficient, which is related to the Manning coefficient (n) by C = h 1/6/n.

In Equation (3c), n is the Manning coefficient (Manning's n), which is the most commonly applied friction parameter in flooding modelling.

As consequence, the use of the Hills and Mader (1997) equation adopting distinct Manning coefficient is not always rigorous.

In fact, the Manning coefficient is not constant with time in the same place due to weed and/or urban growth (Asal, 2003).

For the large compound channel cases, the Manning coefficient for the main channel bed was estimated as 0.02, whereas for the floodplain was 0.01.