Sentence examples for memory representations are from inspiring English sources

Pattern separation is a mechanism for encoding memories, whereby distinct memory representations are created for very similar stimuli and events.

The assumption is that memory representations are formed while an animal is awake and interacting with the environment, and these memories are consolidated mainly while the animal is asleep.

In reconsolidation, memory representations are sensitive to the order of sample data: when samples change in an orderly manner, the reconsolidation process learns and updates effectively.

Furthermore, the correlations with the amount of SWS support the notion that implicit memory representations are modulated by the deeper sleep stages, as previously concluded from behavioral data [26].

A recent fMRI study [21], also using a MVPA approach to investigate visual sensory working memory maintenance, finds feature-specific activity patterns in ipsilateral V1 (relative to stimulus position), which would seem to imply that memory representations are not confined retinotopically.

According to dual representation theory, during a highly emotional event, two differing types of parallel memory representations are encoded.

The passivity of such discrete memory representations is one reason such models have trouble dealing with the ways we can sometimes automatically update relevant background knowledge without explicit search (see Copeland 1993, chapters 4 5).

In particular, the issue of how the content of memory representations is determined is barely mentioned: and the question of how memory traces could provide the right causal connections between past and present if they are not static and permanent inner items is postponed to section 3. Again, the key question here is whether memory does involve representation of the past.

In other cases, however, an exact distinction between closely related memory representations is crucial, e.g. in eyewitness testimony.

Volz and von Cramon interpreted their finding as consistent with other evidence showing mOFC activity when memory representations were important in guiding visual perception [9].

With the nature of these memory representations being so different, schema memories might simply not be represented within the MPFC, PCC, or MTL during retrieval.