Sentence examples for memory representation is from inspiring English sources

Thus our findings suggest that at the earliest stages of combinatory planning in production, a combinatory memory representation is formed that affects the planning of a relevantly similar combination on a subsequent trial.

Because the stimuli remain present in the display, no explicit memory representation is required.

It should perhaps not be surprising that, if a memory representation is manifest in discrete neural circuits of the brain, then brain-states capable of modulating them offline will likewise operate at a similarly sophisticated local, anatomically specific level.

Interestingly, Haenschel et al. recently showed that the formation of a memory representation is associated with a "repetition positivity", consisting in a fronto-central positive deflection in the EEG occurring between 50 and 250 ms after stimulus onset [32].

While the above-mentioned fMRI studies [7], [14], [21] use simple delayed discrimination tasks with long delay intervals between the two stimuli to be discriminated, we take advantage of the memory masking paradigm in which the strength of a memory representation is modulated from trial to trial.

Each facet of a flexible memory representation is both related to other facets of the same representation and to facets of other memory representations.

Fuzzy-trace theory's assumptions about memory representation are cognitive examples of the familiar superposition property of physical quantum systems.

In that case, we would expect strong interactions between attention and WM encoding in posterior regions if the resolution of the memory representation was high.

The passivity of such discrete memory representations is one reason such models have trouble dealing with the ways we can sometimes automatically update relevant background knowledge without explicit search (see Copeland 1993, chapters 4 5).

In particular, the issue of how the content of memory representations is determined is barely mentioned: and the question of how memory traces could provide the right causal connections between past and present if they are not static and permanent inner items is postponed to section 3. Again, the key question here is whether memory does involve representation of the past.

In other cases, however, an exact distinction between closely related memory representations is crucial, e.g. in eyewitness testimony.