Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
However, it is less clear whether memory for items that do not precede a reward but are directly associated with reward consumption is also facilitated.
In addition, we tested memory for items presented during reward consumption, which could be either reliably predicted by a cue or not.
However, these studies did not investigate memory for items which were directly associated with unpredicted outcomes, but rather the consequences of unexpected outcomes for subsequent behavior.
Moreover, memory for items presented during a task which is followed by a reward in case of successful completion is also enhanced if the reward can be predicted [13].
We are aware, however, that an influential theory [15] suggests that memory for items with subsequent 'sure old' responses is based on a different process (recollection) than for items with subsequent 'unsure old' responses (familiarity).
Recent work in neuroscience research has uncovered 2 basic neural signatures associated with memory for items or events: "repetition suppression" and "reactivation" (Desimone 1996).
Similar(54)
The first task was designed to investigate item recognition and memory for item-spatial context associations whereas the second targeted item-item associations.
These two regions may work together to support memory for item or item context associations, and context similarity effects in the anterior HF may reflect the retrieval of contextual information in response to an item cue.
In fact, we find some evidence that comparing related items promotes memory for those items more than comparing unrelated items.
Notably, in the current study, we found that people with aMCI had a slower learning rate for associative memory than for item memory, which provided additional evidence that associative memory was more impaired than item memory in aMCI, as what has been reported by investigation of memory span and total score in multiple learning trials.
This result suggested that the rate of learning in aMCI decelerated more for associative memory than for item memory.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com