Sentence examples for memory errors compared from inspiring English sources

Specifically, scopolamine produced more working memory errors than reference memory errors, while MDMA produced the opposite pattern of significantly more reference memory errors compared to working memory error.

During the whole testing period, Bcl11b mutants exhibited significantly higher numbers of working memory errors compared with control animals.

118, 119 A study conducted in rats indicated that animals maintained with food elevated in saturated fat or a diet with higher saturated fat and cholesterol committed memory errors compared to controls maintained with normal diets when they were tested in several different types of behavioral tasks.

In the radial arm maze, ectopic BXSB/MpJ mice also made significantly more working memory errors as compared to non-ectopics during acquisition (2 7 days), with ectopic deficits being less pronounced during the asymptotic phase (8 12 days; [ 42]; but see [ 41] indicating that ectopic effects on working memory errors are greater during the asymptotic phase of radial arm maze testing).

This model combines fast convergence rates, reduced memory requirements and negligible model reduction errors compared to the full model which makes it an attractive tool for EHL contact performance prediction.

But all of these investments are rounding errors compared to their fossil commitments.

Moreover, evidence of higher spatial working memory errors for MG as compared to sham subjects was evident even after 60 days (12 weeks) of continuous testing – suggesting that spatial working memory deficits in rats with bilateral cortical microgyria are surprisingly persistent.

Bonferroni-correct paired t-tests (p < 0.017 considered significant) showed a significantly lower rate of reference memory errors in the final day compared to the first day (t(7) = 5.44, p = 0.001) and in the probe trials when compared to the first day (t(7) = 5.34, p = 0.001), with again, no difference in probe trials compared to the final day of trials (t(7) = 1.44, p = 0.194; Fig. 5).

Bonferroni-corrected paired t-tests (in which only values with a p < 0.017 were considered significant) found a significantly lower rate of reference memory errors on the final day when compared to the first day (t(7) = 3.31, p = 0.013) and a significantly lower rate of reference memory errors on the probe day when compared to the first day (t(7) = 4.03, p = 0.005).

Values for task latency, the total number of visits, the number of omission errors and the rate of re-entry (working memory) errors as a percentage of total visits were compared between mazes using repeated measures ANOVA.

The number of reference memory errors was also increased significantly in diabetic rats compared with control (P < 0.05), suggesting that learning and memory ability in the diabetic rats were damaged by day 71 (Table  3).> -wrap-foot> A rat diabetes model (streptozotocin-treated group, n = 15) is compared with control (n = 10).