Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
Maleic anhydride yield was generally higher in the membrane reactor due to higher butane conversion.
Enhanced dehydrogenation yields were obtained in the membrane reactor due to the separation of hydrogen from the reaction medium.
However, the lower selectivity of the membrane reactor due to coking is compensated to some extend by a reduced hydrogenolysis.
The determined toxicity of DCF and BPA alone or in a mixture decreased after the treatment with laccase in the membrane reactor due to decreased concentrations of the reactants.
At this optimum catalytic layer thickness, the performance of a catalytic membrane reactor exceeds the performance of an inert membrane reactor due to the close integration of reaction and separation.
Similar(55)
La1−xSrxFe1−yGayO3−δ perovskite membranes are promising candidates for catalytic membrane reactors applications due to their potential high oxygen semi-permeation fluxes and good chemical stability in working conditions.
The results indicate that the enhancement of catalytic performance in the membrane reactor is mainly due to the presence of the lattice oxygen, which has been proved to be necessary for the formation of acrylic acid.
The enhanced performance of the membrane reactor was mainly due to the selective permeation of methanol that made a methanol-deficient phase suppressing MTBE synthesis reaction in the reversible reaction.
The dilution of CH3OH/H2O feed led to an increase in the extent of methanol conversion improvement (a difference of methanol conversion between a membrane reactor and a conventional reactor) due to an increase in the hydrogen recovery.
Due to the incomplete conversion in the membrane reactor, the DMC concentration in the reactor effluent is rather low hence the purification of this diluted stream leads to large recycles and requires large size equipment and a considerable amount of energy.
A comparison between the packed-bed membrane reactor and conventional packed-bed reactor indicates a modest improvement in the conversion and productivity due to in situ hydrogen removal.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com