Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
This paper provides a clear overview on the recent developments of membrane contactor technology in PCC.
This article presents a short review on the recent development of membrane contactor technology.
This review aims to provide a state-of-the-art assessment of the research work carried out so far on membrane contactor technology in PCC.
The use of membrane contactor technology is well-known in the process industry and can be employed in many important fields; such as separation and absorption processes, membrane distillation, pervaporation, biotechnology, food industries etc.
In this chapter, membrane contactor technology is discussed as an original, non-traditional solution to the increasing demand for technologies conducive to sustainable environmental preservation and more competitive industrial growth.
Relative to the cost estimation with no CO2 capture, the evaluation indicates a 56% increase in the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) for the PEEK membrane contactor technology, which is 29% lower than DOE's benchmark amine absorption technology (85% increase in LCOE).
Similar(54)
This study critically evaluated existing literature in terms of process principles, membrane types and functionality, membrane contactor application, technology status, and future research required.
For this, a hollow fiber membrane contactor offers an alternative technology to conventional trickle-bed reactors.
The membrane contactor is an emerging and promising membrane technology for PCC as it integrates the benefits of both liquid absorption (high selectivity) and membrane separation (modularity and compactness).
Gas liquid membrane contactor, which integrates the absorption process with membranes, is an emerging membrane technology that is of particular interest to acid gas absorption.
Another hybrid process, membrane contactor, is not only combining an extraction and an absorption process but both processes are fully integrated and incorporated into one piece of equipment to exploit the benefits of both technologies fully (Klaassen et al. 2008).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com