members without

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "members without" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are referring to individuals who are part of a group but lack a certain quality or characteristic. Example: "The committee is looking for members without prior experience in the field to bring fresh perspectives."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"Now there are six members, without Johnny".

The New York Times - Arts

"We're members without a party," he said.

The New York Times

The driver was released to family members without being charged.

The New York Times

Family members, without exception, talk about Cesar Chavez with deep reverence.

The New York Times

It demands basic democracy from its members, without interfering much in their domestic politics.

The Economist

Officials said the earlier decision had been made by staff members without Mr. Netanyahu's knowledge.

The New York Times

A mail delivery snag left as many as 200 members without access to the system.

The New York Times

But weapons may be given to family members without such formalities.

The New York Times

In addition, each side can challenge the seating of some other panel members without explanation.

The New York Times

One of the few members without ties to Union City, he stood out among them.

The New York Times

"The union had the opportunity to put that offer to their members without any threat of industrial action," he said.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "members without", ensure the context clearly defines what the members lack. This provides clarity and avoids ambiguity in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "members without" in situations where the missing attribute is not clearly defined or understood by the reader. Provide specific details to prevent misinterpretations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "members without" functions as a descriptive phrase, typically used to specify a subset of a group that lacks a particular attribute or characteristic. As Ludwig AI indicates, this phrase is grammatically correct. Examples include "family members without exception" and "staff members without Mr. Netanyahu's knowledge."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

35%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "members without" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to denote individuals within a group who lack a specific attribute or characteristic. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage is correct and acceptable. It's most commonly found in news and scientific contexts, indicating a neutral to professional register. When using this phrase, clarity is key to avoid ambiguity, and numerous alternatives exist to diversify your writing. The phrase's prevalence across authoritative sources underscores its validity and utility in conveying precise information.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

members lacking

Replaces "without" with "lacking", offering a more concise and direct way to express the absence of something.

members not having

Uses a more explicit construction to emphasize the absence of a specific attribute or resource.

members devoid of

Emphasizes a complete absence, making it suitable when highlighting a significant deficiency.

members unequipped with

Highlights a lack of equipment or resources necessary for a particular task or role.

members excluding

Focuses on excluding members who possess a specific trait, rather than simply noting its absence.

members absent of

Uses "absent of" to indicate the lack of a certain quality or characteristic.

members missing

Emphasizes that something is gone or not present among the members.

members deficient in

Highlights a deficiency or inadequacy in a specific area or attribute.

members not possessing

A formal alternative emphasizing the lack of ownership or possession.

members short on

Indicates a shortage or deficiency in a particular resource or attribute.

FAQs

How can I rephrase the term "members without" to avoid repetition?

You can use alternatives like "members lacking", "members not having", or "members devoid of" to add variety to your writing.

Is it grammatically correct to use "members without" in formal writing?

Yes, "members without" is grammatically correct and can be used in formal writing. However, ensure that the context is clear and the sentence structure is appropriate for the tone of your writing.

What is the difference between "members without" and "non-members"?

"Members without" refers to individuals who are part of a group but lack a certain attribute, while "non-members" refers to individuals who are not part of the group at all. The terms are not interchangeable.

In what contexts is it most appropriate to use the phrase "members without"?

The phrase "members without" is appropriate in contexts where you need to specify that certain members of a group do not possess a particular characteristic, skill, or resource. For example, "members without access" or "members without training".