members who

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "members who" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it when referring to specific individuals within a group or organization. Example: "Members who attend the meeting will receive a discount." Alternative expressions include "individuals who" and "participants who."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Clubs like members who obey the rules.

The Guardian

members who favored a more moderate approach.

The New York Times

"It has active members who understand Islam.

The New Yorker

Many members who owned cars sell them.

The New York Times

Actively recruit members who have differing perspectives.

The Guardian

Civil-libertarian members who attended left unsatisfied.

The Guardian

The members who come are completely..."...

The Guardian

members who enthusiastically support John Edwards".

The New York Times

It has hired staff members who speak Mandarin and Cantonese.

The New York Times - Arts

They spoke of family members who had died.

The New York Times

He fooled Brewers staff members who believed he was clean.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "members who", ensure the clause that follows clarifies or provides essential information about the members you are referring to. Be specific and avoid vague descriptions.

Common error

Avoid using "members who" followed by overly broad generalizations that could apply to any member. Instead, focus on specific attributes or actions that distinguish a particular subset of members.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "members who" functions as a noun phrase followed by a relative clause. This combination serves to specify a subset of members based on a certain characteristic or action. Ludwig confirms this usage by showcasing numerous examples across various sources.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

35%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Encyclopedias

5%

Reference

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "members who" is a versatile and grammatically sound construct used to specify a subset of members based on certain criteria. Ludwig AI confirms its wide applicability across varied registers and subject matter, from academic and professional fields to news media and general discussions. When employing "members who", it is important to ensure that the subsequent clause provides valuable and specific details about the members in question, avoiding generic statements. Though subtle alternatives exist like "participants who" and "individuals who are members", this phrase remains a very common and efficient choice for targeted communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

individuals who are members

Rephrases the query emphasizing the individual aspect of the members.

those who are members

Uses "those" as a pronoun to refer to the members, making it slightly more concise.

members that

Replaces the relative pronoun "who" with "that", which is grammatically acceptable in some contexts.

participants who

Substitutes "members" with "participants", focusing on their involvement.

personnel who

Replaces "members" with "personnel", suitable when referring to staff or employees.

staff members who

Adds "staff" to clarify the type of members being referred to, suitable in a professional context.

people who are members

Emphasizes the "people" aspect of membership.

those belonging

Focuses on belonging to a group rather than the term "members".

group members that

Clarifies it pertains only to the "group" aspect.

enrolled members

Highlights the "enrolled" aspect of membership.

FAQs

How do I use "members who" in a sentence?

Use "members who" to introduce a relative clause that provides additional information about specific members of a group. For example, "Members who attend regularly receive extra benefits."

What's a good alternative to "members who"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "participants who", "individuals who are members", or "those who are members" to convey a similar meaning.

Is it correct to say "members that" instead of "members who"?

While "that" can sometimes replace "who" in relative clauses, using "who" is generally preferred when referring to people. Therefore, "members who" is typically considered more grammatically appropriate than "members that".

What is the difference between "members who" and "all members"?

"Members who" refers to a specific subset of members possessing a particular characteristic, while "all members" refers to every single member of the group without exception. "Members who" is restrictive, while "all members" is comprehensive.