Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
Competitive members were coded as trained, non-competitive, recreant members as less trained.
Certifiable qualifications, as aforementioned, were education (measured by years), party membership (with party members coded one and non-party members coded zero), and years of work experience.
The first quote from a team 6 member was coded as evidencing knowledge construction (".. we could elaborate each other's work..".) that is perhaps the most sophisticated desired outcome from collaboration.
Non-related family members (spouses) were coded as unaffected and any other family members as unknown.
Each team member discussed articles coded as "unsure" with another team member.
Parity was the number of children the mother had (including the cohort member) and was coded as 1, 2, 3 or >3 children.
Remaining households with no adult members but a member of unknown age were coded as "undefined" but were included with the category of child-only household in sensitivity analysis.
Informal care, provided by the partner, children, other family members, neighbors or acquaintances, was coded as 0 = no informal care, and 1 = informal care.
The recombination analyses were also expanded to profiles members of subgroups and subgroup founders (coded as double HVR variants, DHVs).
Group is coded as 0 = comparison group member; 1 = intervention group member.
Unaffected family members and individuals with other mental disorders were coded as unknown.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com