Explaining the deviating results at the middle, 50 ng/mL nC60 level, is difficult but it could involve the distinct effects of C60 depending on concentration, medium, target organism, etc., as reported by other authors.
Some analysts believe a similar medium target will be set on Wednesday, but fear a similar outcome when reality bites.
It incorporates a light source, medium, target and observing instrument into single computation environment for real scale ray tracing.
I set it up with the medium target of 3,000 points a day (which you can change if you find it too hard or easy) and found that if I did any sport, I easily beat it.
At medium target concentrations (12.5 200 pM), the effect of having different numbers of mismatches is clear.
Previous studies already showed that search is less efficient for medium targets than for small or large targets [16] [18].
The medium target was probably more difficult to find because it was somewhat similar to both thin and thick distractors, rendering target discrimination more difficult.
The finding that dwell times were overall longest with the medium target, and were moreover strongly affected by target similarity suggest that dwell times are determined by target discriminability, and thus by the same factors that determine search efficiency.
In search for a medium target, dwell times on medium distractors were longest, significantly longer than on thin distractors (F 1,11) = 61.1; p<.001) and on thick distractors (F 1,11) = 7.4; p = .020).020
If detection difficulty modulates dwell times on top of similarity, then we would expect dwell times to be longest on thin distractors in the thin target condition, and shortest on thick distractors in the thick target condition, with intermediate dwell times for medium distractors in the medium target condition.
