The results are interpreted as follows: relative to the reference category (non-dependent), a primary informal caregiver of an individual in a category of heavy dependence is 44.3% more likely to fall into the high-level category of care, 13.5% less likely to be in the medium-level category, and 30.8% less likely to fall into the low-level category.
The categories at a lower level are included in the higher level categories and chapters.
Overall, the community and public health interventions tended to have high benefits and medium level overall costs and tended to have lower cost effectiveness ratios than many of the interventions in the other two categories.
The total poverty score ranged from 5 to 20 with the following categories: 5 indicating low poverty; 6 to 12 indicating a medium level of poverty; and 13 to 20 indicating high levels of poverty.
These levels are upper level (company level), medium level (project level), and subnetwork level.
We categorized the results from the likelihood mapping analysis into 3 main categories of signal: category 1 had strong phylogenetic signal (see Figure 3a), category 2 had medium level of phylogenetic signal (see Figure 3b) and category 3 had low/no levels of phylogenetic signal (see Figure 3c).
Animal density variables were put into 3 categories: absence, medium levels, and high levels of production.
Based on these scores, we created the following categories of nutritional knowledge: low level (<mean – standard deviation), <span class="lh">medium level (mean ± standard deviation) and high level (>mean + standard deviation).
The categories, as illustrated in the conceptual model (Fig. 2), address aspects on individual level (categories 1, 2), community level (categories 3 -5) and healthcare system level (category 6).
While cut-offs between low, medium, and high transcript level categories were somewhat arbitrary, they were chosen to yield a relative distribution of genes into these categories similar to the distribution of yeast genes into low, medium, and high expression categories reported previously by Nagalakshimi et al. [ 15].
Socioeconomic status (SES) by occupation includes the six categories on the labour market: higher non-manual employees, medium level non-manual employees, low level non-manual employees, skilled manual workers and unskilled manual workers as well as self-employed/farmers.
