Sentence examples for medium contrast was from inspiring English sources

Response amplitude with medium contrast was significantly (p = 0.006) larger after adaptation to medium contrast than in mixed contrasts blocks but the median (102.6%) indicates relatively small changes in this case.

We found that HWHH at medium contrast was significantly less than at high contrast (p<0.0001, n = 62 pairs), with the HWHH at medium contrast representing 88.9% (median) of the HWHHs at high contrast.

HWHH at medium contrast was not significantly different from that obtained at high contrast (p = 0.47, n = 62 pairs), with the HWHH at medium contrast representing 96.0% (median) or 100.6% (mean) of the HWHH at high contrast (Fig. 9B).

Finally, HWHHs obtained with medium contrast were expected to change little: medium contrast was intended to evoke response close to the mean obtained with the three contrasts in mixed contrasts protocols (although slightly lower by experimental design), therefore inducing comparable amount of adaptation.

Finally, given that, by experimental design, medium contrast should have yielded a response close to the mean obtained with the mean of the three contrasts in use, response amplitude after adaptation to medium contrast was expected not to differ much from response amplitude after mixed contrasts adaptation.

At the population level, responses obtained at low contrast were significantly lower than at medium contrast (p<0.0001), and responses at medium contrast were significantly lower than at high contrast (p<0.0001).

In contrast to what was observed in the mixed contrasts condition, the cumulative distributions (Fig. 9A) show that HWHHs of orientation tuning curves obtained in the constant contrast condition with high and medium contrast are quite similar.

RURA for low and medium contrasts were not significantly modified by adaptation (not illustrated).

Distributions obtained for medium and high contrast are comparable to those obtained using flashing stimuli in behaving macaques [68].

Actually, in 3172 patients (52.4%) diagnostic CT, oral contrast medium and intravenous contrast medium were used together, whereas diagnostic CT and oral contrast medium were only used in 326 patients (5.4%) without intravenous contrast medium.

For medium contrast, the correlation was not significant (p = 0.16).