Visibility along transects was qualitatively recorded (good, medium and poor) and sections with poor visibility were removed from the analysis.
The environment denotes the abundance of oases and can be chosen from three options: rich, medium, and poor.
The socio-economic characteristics and sources of livelihood strategies in relation to household groups (i.e. rich, medium, and poor), key household external and internal factors constraining crop production, were collected through the household survey and focus groups.
In the third stage, from the agro-pastoral group a total of four peasant associations (4PAs), two from each district were selected randomly and then, households in each selected PAs were categorized into three socio-economic classes i.e. rich, medium and poor (Table 1 ).
In the third stage, four peasant associations (4PAs) were selected randomly and then households in each selected PA were categorized into three socio-economic classes, i.e. rich, medium, and poor (locally determined by number of livestock owned, size of cultivated land, and other capital assets).
Figure 5 shows the fit of each of the three classes of the model 5 in one individual (good, medium and poor fit, respectively).
We evaluated the FA content of this strain, compared to WT, using gas chromatography (GC), under different conditions of nutrition [rich medium (YPG) and poor medium (YNB, low or high C/N)].
Households were then ranked according to their wealth score and divided into three terciles indicating the poorest, medium, and least poor households.
Considering WSA approach, sub-watersheds were alienated into very high, high, medium, low and poor priority zones.
The left-hand column shows the number of good, medium (fair), and poor results one year after the operation.
In the right-hand column are shown the proportion of good, medium (fair), and poor results seen when the patients were last examined.
