Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
Drug errors are the most common kind of medical mistake, and some studies have found that computerized systems can reduce medication errors caused by illegible handwriting and faulty transcription.
Medication errors caused problems in 162 cases.
Electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) may prevent medication errors caused by prescription illegibility; however, information technologies also may introduce different kinds of medication errors.
Included in this list are computerized systems to reduce medication errors caused by doctors' sloppy handwriting or by similar-looking drug packaging, requirements that surgeons mark the site of an operation and perform "timeouts" to double-check plans to stop wrong-site operations, and the placement of disinfectant hand-gel dispensers outside patient rooms to encourage rigorous hand hygiene.
Similar(56)
Insulin administration errors pose a serious problem for hospitalized patients, specifically for children (1, 2), and are responsible for 39% of the serious medication errors causing harm to patients (3).
Medication errors have been reported to be a leading cause of death in hospitalized patients.
Jayaram noted that during the study period, there were no medication errors that caused death or serious, permanent harm.
Two ADRs were medication errors, one caused by licensed drugs and one due to unlicensed used drugs.
A 1999 report by the Institute of Medicine ("To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System") documented the extent of the problem: Medication errors were causing measurable harm to 1.5 million people a year, costing $3.5 billion in additional treatment for resulting injuries, and leading to some 7,000 preventable deaths.
Medication errors can cause direct and immediate adverse drug reactions (eg, rash) and we found six such cases among the 93 AEs.
On the one hand, medication errors that do not cause harm are excluded, as are near-miss events.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com