Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The authors conducted for the first time a medication error review (REMED) following a medication error occurred in an intensive care unit.
Similar(59)
Other complementary approaches, such as medication error reviews that allow for a collective and multidisciplinary error analysis, should also be implemented.
30 Therefore, 1 year after the end of the study, the hospital records of all subjects in whom a medication error was detected were reviewed.
References. 1. Wong T. et al. Effect of critical care pharmacist´s intervention on medication errors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.J Crit Care.
However, this limitation may be deemed acceptable in the light of observations made by a systematic review of the medication error literature challenging the assumption of an automatically given association between the number of error types considered on the one hand and the overall error prevalence detected on the other [ 15].
See related review by Moyen et al., Medication error is the most commonly observed threat to patient safety in the intensive care unit (ICU).
Medication error represents the second commonest cause of malpractice claims in this review.
The objective of this systematic review is to analyse the relative risk reduction on medication error and adverse drug events (ADE) by computerized physician order entry systems (CPOE).
This review of malpractice claims in primary care highlights diagnosis and medication error as areas to be prioritised in developing educational strategies and risk management systems.
AE: Adverse event; HMPS: Harvard Medical Practice Study GTT Global Trigger Toolol; NA: Not applicable; NCC MERP: National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention; PPV: Positive predictive value; RN Registeredd nurse; RRR: Retrospective record review.
The assessment and plan was reviewed by 2 faculty members and included a score for whether the student identified the medication error anywhere in their documentation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com